Wednesday, December 29, 2004

Is this the end of The Wire?

Word is that HBO’s The Wire, probably the best show on television, might not be brought back for a fourth year. If this were NBC we were talking about, the show’s axing would be a done deal. It’s a little disheartening to see that HBO, which has far less need to slavishly follow the ratings, is acting like they are no better or wiser.

In a multi-channel cable universe dominated by programs that appeal to the least-demanding audience, HBO has stood head and shoulders above the rest, demonstrating a commitment to quality programming that is unmatched anywhere else.

That attitude, along with a willingness to take risks on an unconventional show, has paid off with The Wire. For three seasons now, the cast and creators of the show have produced what is arguably the finest television being created today. Unfortunately, the audience hasn’t been as accepting as the critics, causing a steep downturn in the ratings this past season.

The network has to accept a large part of the blame for that, however. After successfully using The Wire as counter-programming its first two seasons, running it against the summer rerun onslaught, HBO decided to air the show on Sunday nights in the middle of the fall season. Doing so placed it in direct competition with ABC’s breakout hit Desperate Housewives, as well as the NFL on ESPN. No show could survive that battle unscathed.

It’s a shame, too, as The Wire is the rare show that actually deserves a little special consideration. Although The Sopranos is the show that gets the majority of the plaudits and attention, The Wire is arguably superior. It features sharper writing and more complex plots, while at the same time not relying on tropes that are at least as old as The Godfather.

What The Wire has done so well – and what makes it such a great show – is capture the essence of fine crime fiction and present it in a vibrant, dramatic fashion on the small screen. The elements that make the crime novel work (e.g., moral ambiguity, multi-faceted, often unsympathetic characters, twisted and suspenseful plots, insight into police and criminal procedure) are all part of
the stories The Wire tells so well.

Of course, none of this should come as a surprise, given the quality of talent responsible for writing the show. Not only is David Simon (the creator of Homicide) the Executive Producer and one of the writers, but also on board are acclaimed crime writers George Pelecanos, Dennis Lehane and Richard Price. That line-up surely gives this show the most prestigious literary pedigree on television.

The novelistic background of the writers of The Wire serves the show well, as they have the courage not to pull their punches, something that is almost never seen in network television. In a medium where writers are generally desperate to make their characters likable caricatures, The Wire goes in the opposite direction. They don’t care about making nice; they just want to get it right.

There are times when the show’s villains – most of them drug dealers – are the most amiable and admirable figures. The character of Stringer Bell (played by Idris Elba), in particular, is fascinating, with his attendance at college economics classes and other attempts to elevate his mind and his status.

On the other hand, Jimmy McNulty (played by Dominic West), the nominal hero of the show, is quite often something of a creep, drinking himself into oblivion, pissing away his career, using his kids to help tail a suspect – the same young children he leaves home alone at night to answer a bootie call – and otherwise making a hash of his life.

Of course, the complexity of the characters is part of the problem the show has in developing an audience. Most television viewers like their shows to be simple, with clear-cut good guys and bad guys. They want to cheer and hiss like the audience at a melodrama; they don’t want to think or be challenged.

They also want shows that are easy to follow, with simplistic stories and tidy endings. The Wire doesn’t deliver those things either. The story arcs last the entire season; they take time to develop and grow, and require the viewer to put in a little effort to keep up with the plot. (Along with Fox’s 24, this is really a show that you have to watch each week to fully appreciate.)

But the pay-off is more than worth it, as the stories are fresh and compelling and as entertaining as anything you will see on TV. With such quality programs as The Sopranos and Curb Your Enthusiasm, HBO has proved that it is the place for the best shows on television. If they can’t find room for The Wire in their line-up, that would really be a crime.

Write to HBO to request they keep The Wire alive.


Writing Suspense: Fiction vs. Reality

Writing Suspense: Fiction vs. Reality
By Michele Martinez
Author of Most Wanted, due in February 2005

As a federal prosecutor in New York City, I spent most of a decade locking up hardened criminals. Specializing in narcotics and gangs cases, I knew crime inside out. By the time I left that job, I’d done so many drug trials, listened in on so many wiretaps, and debriefed so many cold-blooded killers and thugs about so many different types of crimes that I could have gone out and committed one myself. And gotten away with it. So it seemed like an obvious evolution to start writing suspense novels based on my gritty real-life experiences. I figured crafting a page-turner out of that material had to be a piece of cake, right?

Far from it. There’s a lot more to writing good suspense than knowing the ins and outs of the drug and murder biz. Here I was in possession of the world’s best raw material, but when I sat down to write fiction, I was staring at a blank screen just like anybody else. I wasn’t trying to write a memoir. This wasn’t a chronicle of my daily life in the Brooklyn courthouse or a recitation of the elements of proof for a heroin conspiracy charge. It was a novel. It needed to grab the reader by the neck on page one, sustain interest over hundreds of pages in the middle, and rush to a stunning and startling conclusion. I might have harrowing inside details at my fingertips, but I was a novice when it came to arranging them into a winning story. I needed a riveting plot, compelling characters. I needed a surprise ending. I needed to learn how to create suspense.

You see, if you’re doing your job right in law enforcement, there just isn’t that much suspense involved. In real life, you arrest a guy on -- say -- a heroin charge. He’s facing ten years to life in federal prison, so he decides to talk. “Flip,” we call it. He tells you, hey, the drug dealer supplying heroin to my organization is a major player. He’s moving heavy weight every week out of such-and-such location. And, by the way, remember those bodies that turned up a couple of months back with the arms and legs chopped off? His people did that. I can ID the shooter for you and tell you exactly where and how it happened.

Nine times out of ten, your informer is telling the truth, but you still have to prove it. So you spend months meticulously building your case from the ground up, looking for corroboration and admissible evidence. You use all sorts of tried and true but dull investigative techniques, like subpoenas for telephone or bank records, and drawn-out wiretaps that require tons of paperwork. And you end up with a solid case against the same guy you knew months ago committed the crime. No gun battles, no stay-up-all-night suspense, no big surprises. Hardly the stuff of great fiction.

So the first thing I did was sit down and spend six months pounding out a pretty rough first draft. I literally threw that draft away -- didn’t even keep a copy. But it was invaluable, because I got the bones of my book down. I had my basic cast of characters, led by federal prosecutor Melanie Vargas, who decides to go after a headline-grabbing murder case at the worst possible moment in her personal life -- when she has a new baby at home and discovers her husband is cheating. The first draft also contained a host of secondary characters who I knew were keepers, from Melanie’s overbearing boss Bernadette, to the sexy-as-hell FBI Agent Dan O’Reilly, to the wealthy, silver-tongued murder victim Jed Benson, to Slice, the psychotic killer suspected in Benson’s death. And it had the basic plot as well: murderer kills victim with the assistance of certain surprising accomplices; prosecutor must solve crime before she becomes the next victim. Now I had something to work with.

But a lot was missing, and I wasn’t even exactly sure what. I felt the draft was flabby. It had too much detail in the wrong places. And it wasn’t scary enough. So I decided to take a break, and use the time to embark on a big reading campaign. I wanted to go back and re-read my favorite suspense writers to get a better feel for what made them so masterful and their books so compulsively readable.

The basic answer turned out to be pretty obvious: great characters, evocative settings, believable dialogue, compelling plots. I felt I had the seeds of those things, but I needed to work, work, work. I started carrying a small notebook at all times to write down snippets of overheard conversation, resonant song lyrics, powerful visual images that I happened across in the course of a day. I saved the best things and worked them into my draft. I revised dialogue again and again, read it aloud, played with it in my head, until I was sure it sounded right. And I paid attention to the technique in my favorite books. I read “above the lines,” as they say. Here are a few of the things I observed that helped me improve my own writing:

Point of View. I realized that generally the suspense novels I found the most engrossing were written in the third person and frequently told the story from more than one viewpoint. I had been working in the first person, but ultimately this felt too limiting technically. I wanted to show the reader action beyond things that happened directly to my protagonist. I wanted to write the killer in his lair polishing his knife, or the innocent eyewitness watching television late at night, unsuspecting, about to be disemboweled. I wanted to plant clues for the reader that the protagonist was unaware of. I wanted to branch out and make my story bigger and more memorable.

Cliffhangers and a ticking clock. I realized I just hadn’t structured my book carefully enough. I needed to pay more attention to the transitions between chapters, to give the reader that burning desire to keep turning the pages. I needed to hold back more, tease more. And it couldn’t hurt to come up with a good “ticking clock” -- a bomb that would explode and kill the characters if not defused in time. My favorite ticking clock of all time is the girl in the pit in Silence of the Lambs, who will die within days if Clarice Starling doesn’t catch the killer. I went back and re-worked my draft, paying much more attention to these structural elements, and really giving serious thought to how I could build suspense with each chapter.

Misdirection. I also realized I was too closely wedded to my real-life law enforcement experience, where we generally knew who the villain was from the outset. That just didn’t make for compelling narrative. So I set about crafting sub-plots that would provide alternative scenarios for the murder. They had to be credible and well-realized enough to throw readers off the scent, so when the true killer(s) were revealed in the end, there would be an element of surprise.

Armed with these observations, I sat down and did what every real writer must do: spend huge gobs of time rewriting, rewriting and rewriting again. And that, ultimately, was the real lesson I learned. No matter how much I thought I knew about crime, there was plenty more to learn about writing, and always a way to improve that once-blank page.

Michele Martinez, a graduate of Harvard University and Stanford Law School, is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney. Her debut thriller, Most Wanted, is available in hardcover from William Morrow and audio CD from HarperAudio wherever books are sold. For more information, visit www.michelemartinez.com.

Friday, December 17, 2004

Michael Crichton contest -- final day

Okay, folks, here's your last chance to win! You could win a copy of Michael Crichton's new book, State of Fear, or other cool prizes.

Go to this page and enter the following locations. Each one you enter gives you a chance to win instantly.

Paris Nord, France
Pavutu, Africa
Pahang, Malaysia
Shad Thames, London
Tokyo, Japan
Vancouver, BC
San Francisco, CA
Point Moody, CA
Punta Arenas, Chile
Weddell Station, Antarctica
Beverly Hills, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Century City, CA
City of Commerce, CA
Diablo Canyon, AZ
McKinley State Park, AZ
Arroraville, AZ
Oakland, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Resolution Bay, Gareda
Pavutu, Gareda

Good luck!

Thursday, December 16, 2004

Michael Crichton scares up big sales

According to Nielsen Bookscan, Michael Crichton's latest techno-thriller, State of Fear, was very popular with book buyers its debut week, landing at #2 on the Bestselling Fiction chart with sales of 108,000 copies.

I haven't read it yet, but my sense of it based on the reviews and word-of-mouth is that it's good, not great, with some interesting scientific information, although it gets preachy. (Crichton is trying to point out to readers how the fears of global warming are based more on propaganda than evidence.)

I don't feel as strong a need to read Crichton's work as I once did, but I do still find him a fascinating figure.

Sunday, December 12, 2004

Latest Chicago Sun-Times Column

My latest column ran in the Chicago Sun-Times this morning. The books included are:

They were all entertaining reads, although I was particularly impressed by the Koontz book, one of the best things I've read all year.


Thursday, December 09, 2004

Holiday Gift Giving Guide -- Book Version

Some gift suggestions for the readers in your life!

Latest Bestsellers

From the Book Standard, the public face of Nielsen BookScan, comes this week's fiction bestsellers, based on actual sales at bookstores and other retailers around the country. 89,000 books sold by Mitch Albom this week!
  1. THE FIVE PEOPLE YOU MEET IN HEAVEN, Mitch Albom (Hyperion, Hardcover)
  2. A SALTY PIECE OF LAND, Jimmy Buffett (Little, Brown & Co., Hardcover with CD)
  3. BLACK WIND, Clive Cussler (Putnam, Hardcover)
  4. THE DA VINCI CODE, Dan Brown (Doubleday Books, Hardcover)
  5. NIGHT FALL, Nelson DeMille (Warner Books, Hardcover)
Chart Note: Once again, 3 of the top 5 are mystery or suspense books.

Sara Ann Freed Memorial Award for First Mystery

Mysterious Press announced today that a winner has been selected for the first Sara Ann Freed Memorial Award for debut mystery novel. The award, which is in honor of Mysterious Press' longtime editor who passed away in June 2003, was given to Sacred Cows by Karen E. Olson. The award consists of a $10,000 advance and publication in hardcover by Mysterious Press, an imprint of the TimeWarner Book Group.

Set in New Haven, Sacred Cows features Annie Seymour, a police reporter for a New Haven daily who is covering the murder of ayoung woman who was a student at Yale. Sharp-talking with a self-deprecating sense of humor, Annie is a fresh and original new sleuth on the mystery scene.

In announcing the award Mysterious Press editor Kristen Weber said, "Sara Ann had a flair for discovering new talent and this novel continues that tradition." It will be published in September 2005.

Wednesday, December 08, 2004

New York Times 100 Notable Books of the Year

The Times released their list of the 100 Notable Books of 2004.

My unbroken streak of being 180 degrees out of the touch with the literati continues, as I hadn't read a single one of them.

In my defense, though, I had heard of a few...

The Son of the World's Worst Interview

Hack Writer Victor Gischler is back with another round of The World's Worst Interview. This time his victim is the delightfully funny Julia Spencer-Fleming, who writes a series about a priest who flies helicopters.
VG: Zapa-dappitty-doo-wap-doowap diddly-DOO! What do you think of that?

JSF: Victor, I had no idea. Next time we get together, you and I are going jitterbugging. No excuses.

I loved the part about Denise Hamilton wanting to mow down the bookstore workers with an assault rifle.

Marcia Muller named Grand Master by MWA

The Mystery Writers of America has named Marcia Muller, "'the founding mother' of the modern hard-boiled female private eye novel," a Grand Master. Other authors to receive the organization's highest designation include Robert B. Parker, Elmore Leonard, Lawrence Block, Donald Westlake, Tony Hillerman, P.D. James, Ellery Queen, Daphne du Maurier, Graham Greene, James M. Cain, Rex Stout, Agatha Christie, and Raymond Chandler.

Congrats to Ms. Muller!

Tuesday, December 07, 2004

A late entry in the Top 5 Favorites list

Dylan Schaffer, author of the superb debut Misdemeanor Man, adds his contributions to Mystery Ink's Top 5 Favorites list.
  • The Narrows by Michael Connelly -- I recently saw Connelly's book, and various other titles, on sale in an obscure town on the Vietnam/China border. Any writer who has infiltrated a former enemy this deeply deserves our awe. And it's an un-put-downable, thought-provoking, nearly perfect book.
  • Devil in the White City by Erik Larson -- I realize I'm getting to this late, and everyone else in the world has read it, but the evocation of Chicago, circa late 19th century, and the portraits of two men, one essentially good, and one totally evil, was as compelling as I've ever read. Not exactly a crime/mystery, but definitely worth reading if you're one of the eight people left who hasn't already done so.
  • Train by Pete Dexter -- Others have already said why, and I agree. A fabulous, moving, disturbing book.
  • The Fortress of Solitude by Jonathan Lethem -- I came late to this one, too, but I loved it. If you grew up anywhere near the NY area in the seventies, this one will be like going home.
  • Careless Love: The Unmaking of Elvis Presley by Peter Guralnick -- I'm researching a book about Elvis, and this one is at the top of the heap, particularly if you're interested in Presley's late career. It's eminently readable and profoundly sad. Even if you're not that interested in Elvis, it's worth checking out.

Monday, December 06, 2004

Top Five Favorites for 2004

Mystery Ink polled over 50 fiction writers, reviewers and other assorted readers, asking them to name their five favorite books they read during the year. They didn't have to be new, didn't even have to be mysteries. We just wanted to know what people liked.

You can see the complete lists over on the website. The responses were very interesting, as you'd imagine. This is a well-read bunch!

Some interesting stats from the results:

Most-cited book: Scott Phillips' Cottonwood -- 7 picks
Second most-cited book (tie): Ken Bruen's The Guards and T. Jefferson Parker's California Girl -- 6 picks each
Most-cited author: Ken Bruen -- 11 picks
Second most-cited author: T. Jefferson Parker -- 7 picks
Third most-cited author: Lee Child -- 6 picks
Most-cited debut book: J.A. Konrath's Whiskey Sour -- 3 picks
Most-cited unreleased book (tie): Kent Harrington's Red Jungle and Ray Banks' The Big Blind -- 2 picks each
Most-cited non-crime fiction book: Pete Dexter's Train -- 3 picks
Book I most wish I could have included: Laura Lippman's Every Secret Thing -- I read it last year, thus it wasn't eligible.

The contributors were (in alphabetical order): Ace Atkins, Yvette Banek, Michael A. Black, Lawrence Block, James O. Born, C.J. Box, Steve Brewer, Lee Child, Oline Cogdill, Michael Connelly, Robert Crais, Sean Doolittle, Barry Eisler, Aaron Elkins, Robert Ferrigno, Bill Fitzhugh, Jim Fusilli, Victor Gischler, Lee Goldberg, Maggie Griffin, Denise Hamilton, Steve Hamilton, Libby Fischer Hellman, Gregg Hurwitz, Julie Hyzy, J.A. Konrath, Harley Jane Kozak, Rochelle Krich, William Kent Krueger, Terrill Lee Lankford, David Montgomery, Chris Mooney, Heidi Moos, David Morrell, Eddie Muller, T. Jefferson Parker, George Pelecanos, Thomas Perry, Ralph Pezzullo, Gary Phillips, Scott Phillips, Rob Reuland, M.J. Rose, Julia Spencer-Fleming, Olen Steinhauer, Charlie Stella, James Swain, Duane Swierczynski, Fiona Walker, Robert W. Walker, Robert Ward, Sarah Weinman, Kevin Wignall and Brian Wiprud.

Friday, December 03, 2004

Book Sense Picks for January

Book Sense, an arm of the American Booksellers Association, announces their picks for the best books of January 2005. Here are the crime fiction titles that made the cut:

  • THE COLD DISH, by Craig Johnson (Viking, $23.95, 0670033693)
  • OUT: A Novel, by Natsuo Kirino (Vintage, $12.95 paper, 1400078377)
  • ENTOMBED: A Novel, by Linda Fairstein (Scribner, $26, 0743254880)
  • REVOLUTION NO. 9: A Novel, by Neil McMahon (HarperCollins, $15.95, 0060529180)
  • VALLEY OF BONES: A Novel, by Michael Gruber (Morrow, $24.95, 0060577665)
  • THE VANISHED HANDS, by Robert Wilson (Harcourt, $25, 0151008418)

Latest Bestsellers

From the Book Standard, the public face of Nielsen BookScan, comes this week's fiction bestsellers, based on actual sales at bookstores and other retailers around the country:
  1. NIGHT FALL, Nelson DeMille (Warner Books, Hardcover)
  2. THE FIVE PEOPLE YOU MEET IN HEAVEN, Mitch Albom (Hyperion, Hardcover)
  3. LONDON BRIDGES, James Patterson (Little, Brown & Co, Hardcover)
  4. THE DA VINCI CODE, Dan Brown (Doubleday Books, Hardcover)
  5. BLUE DAHLIA, Nora Roberts (Jove Books, Paperback)

Note that 3 of the top 5 are mystery or suspense books.

Wednesday, December 01, 2004

The Mystery Bookstore's Top 10

The staff at L.A.'s Mystery Bookstore, a great place to buy books, offer up their picks for the best of the year.

Here are the choices of owner Shelly McArthur:

Jilliane Hoffman, Retribution
Jodi Compton, The 37th Hour
John Shannon, Terminal Island
Alan Furst, Dark Voyage
M.C. Beaton, Death of a Poison Pen
Barry Eisler, Rain Storm
Jack Kerley, The Hundredth Man
John Dunning, The Bookman's Promise
Gayle Lynds, The Coil
Liz Evans, Sick as a Parrot

Some nice picks. A couple of those (Eisler & Lynds) are probably going to be on my list as well.